I'm sharing the pain here....
Jun. 27th, 2003 01:40 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
celestialfrayDavid Boreanaz was never my thing. Didn't really have an opinion about him beyond boredom and disinterest. But now? Cringing in horror here. I really did not need to know this about him:
From an old interview in FHM:
Actually, I’ve got a big female foot fetish, a pedicure is always in my repertoire, as is massaging the foot with olive oil. I like seeing open-toed shoes so you’ve got shoe cleavage on the heel – that’s a big, big thing for me. And then foot cleavage as well, which is when you can just see the tops of the toes exposed at the front of the shoe. Watch out for women with one long toe that hangs over – that means she’s horny and aggressive in bed.
ETA: Curse you LJ for inactivating 7 of my icons. (expired paid account) Devious bastards.
From an old interview in FHM:
Actually, I’ve got a big female foot fetish, a pedicure is always in my repertoire, as is massaging the foot with olive oil. I like seeing open-toed shoes so you’ve got shoe cleavage on the heel – that’s a big, big thing for me. And then foot cleavage as well, which is when you can just see the tops of the toes exposed at the front of the shoe. Watch out for women with one long toe that hangs over – that means she’s horny and aggressive in bed.
ETA: Curse you LJ for inactivating 7 of my icons. (expired paid account) Devious bastards.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2003-06-27 01:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-27 02:08 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-27 02:13 am (UTC):)
no subject
Date: 2003-06-27 02:13 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-27 02:35 am (UTC)(And the cluckin' and jivin' chicken fear cemented it for me.)
no subject
Date: 2003-06-27 09:28 am (UTC)Also - in point of fact, the "one longer toe" thing? It just means you're lesbionically inclined. That's of the good.
Note to self: Bring rubber chicken to next BtVS/AtS con.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-27 10:03 am (UTC)Really? Well, that's good to know.
Re:
Date: 2003-06-28 12:49 pm (UTC)